ArticleCureus2026
Spatial and Machine Learning Analysis of District-Level Health Insurance Inequities in Ghana.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) remains central to achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC). Nevertheless, UHC "resource commitment" is rarely paired with detailed access analyses, and inequities at the district level continue to persist. National aggregate data often overlook inequities at subnational levels, while the systematic and uneven resource distribution within the country's most underdeveloped regions, sub-regions, or localities requires empirical identification. Objective The study aimed to examine the geographical distribution of uninsurance in Ghana and to perform predictive machine learning for the socioeconomic risk stratification of all 261 districts. Methods The study employed a quantitative, cross-sectional, and ecological design utilizing the 2021 Population and Housing Census data. The research integrates geospatial autocorrelation analysis with Decision Tree Classification (DTC). Spatial dependence and geographic clusters were assessed using Global Moran's I and Bivariate Local Indicators of Spatial Association (LISA). For the machine learning model, which utilized Gini impurity as the splitting criterion, the features included variables of multidimensional poverty, illiteracy, and unemployment, while a 70/30 train-test split was used for all 261 Metropolitan, Municipal, and District Assemblies (MMDAs). Results There was significant positive spatial autocorrelation (Global Moran's I = 0.422, p < 0.001). This result identified 42 "High-High" uninsurance clusters, the majority of which were in the northern savanna region. The DTC model's overall accuracy was 82.5%, with the illiteracy rate being the primary predictor (84.7% feature importance) of uninsurance risk. Partial dependence analysis found a significant illiteracy threshold of 30.3%. The risk of a district being classified as "high" increased significantly as each successive unit above the threshold was recorded. Conclusion Health insurance unavailability in Ghana is geographically clustered and is strongly associated with literacy levels. While the design is ecological in nature and, as such, limits direct causal inference, it indicates that institutional complexity acts as a navigational barrier to enrollment. The 42 hotspots, in addition to the 10 "Red List" priority districts, serve as targets for interventions to reduce health inequities. Meeting these identified priorities is essential for the transition toward Universal Health Coverage and requires the integration of operational and system-level reforms with education-sensitive, geographically targeted resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.