ArticleFrontiers in aging2026
Unwanted loneliness among older adults in rural areas: associated factors and guidelines for community intervention.
Article in Frontiers in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Loneliness in older women: a multidimensional population-based study of social, health, and life-course factors.Frontiers in aging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Unwanted loneliness among older adults has become a growing public health concern, particularly in rural contexts characterized by population aging, depopulation, and limited access to services. While many interventions focus on functional and social dimensions, the subjective and emotional roots of loneliness remain insufficiently explored. This study aims to identify profiles at greater risk of loneliness and to analyze personal and community activities that may help mitigate it in highly depopulated rural municipalities. Methods: A cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted in five rural areas of western Salamanca, in municipalities with fewer than 500 inhabitants. A total of 153 individuals aged 60 and over participated. Structured interviews were carried out, including a sociodemographic questionnaire, variables related to available services, personal and community activities, and the UCLA Loneliness Scale Version 3. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests. Results: 41.2% of participants reported moderate or severe levels of loneliness. Living alone, having a low educational level, and not engaging in social or leisure activities were associated with higher levels of loneliness. Significant associations were found between loneliness and variables such as living alone (p = 0.012), not talking on the phone (p = 0.024), not reading (p = 0.010), and not engaging in community activities like going out, spending time with family, or exercising (p < 0.01). The availability of services in the municipality showed no statistically significant relationship. Conclusion: In rural contexts, loneliness among older adults appears to be more strongly influenced by the quality and frequency of social relationships than by the mere availability of services. Interventions should address not only structural or functional needs but also the emotional and relational dimensions, through personalized and community-based strategies that promote overall wellbeing. It is crucial to distinguish between social isolation and subjective loneliness, and to guide policies toward the strengthening of human connection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.