Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41728380›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in digital health2026

Artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis and histopathological grading of bladder cancer: current status, challenges, and future directions.

Lihao Zhang, Yinghao Zhong, Gang Yang, Lige Huang, Aijia Deng, Mengxin Ao, Jiabing Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lihao ZhangNorth Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Yinghao ZhongNorth Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Gang YangNorth Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Lige HuangNorth Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Aijia DengSouthwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Mengxin AoNorth Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Jiabing LiMianyang Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Mianyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bladder cancer is one of the most prevalent malignant tumors of the urinary system worldwide, and its diagnosis and histopathological grading are crucial for clinical decision-making and prognostic evaluation. Although traditional methods such as cystoscopy, imaging, and histological examination remain the clinical gold standard, they suffer from significant subjectivity and interobserver variability. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning (DL)-based approaches, has demonstrated substantial potential in image recognition, histopathological grading, and risk prediction. This review systematically summarizes recent advances in the application of AI to bladder cancer diagnosis and grading, covering imaging analysis, digital pathology, molecular marker identification, and AI-driven clinical decision support. In addition, key challenges associated with current AI technologies are discussed, including data quality, model generalizability, interpretability, clinical translation, and ethical and regulatory considerations. Finally, future research directions are outlined, including multimodal AI integration, incorporation of biomarkers, and the development of intelligent decision-support systems. Overall, AI is poised to play an increasingly important role in improving diagnostic accuracy and enabling personalized management of bladder cancer, thereby advancing the intelligent and data-driven management of urologic oncology.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebladder cancerdeep learningdigital pathologyhistopathological gradingprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID41728380
PMCPMC12916576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.