ReviewFrontiers in digital health2026
Artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis and histopathological grading of bladder cancer: current status, challenges, and future directions.
Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human biomarker navigator.iMeta · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bladder cancer is one of the most prevalent malignant tumors of the urinary system worldwide, and its diagnosis and histopathological grading are crucial for clinical decision-making and prognostic evaluation. Although traditional methods such as cystoscopy, imaging, and histological examination remain the clinical gold standard, they suffer from significant subjectivity and interobserver variability. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning (DL)-based approaches, has demonstrated substantial potential in image recognition, histopathological grading, and risk prediction. This review systematically summarizes recent advances in the application of AI to bladder cancer diagnosis and grading, covering imaging analysis, digital pathology, molecular marker identification, and AI-driven clinical decision support. In addition, key challenges associated with current AI technologies are discussed, including data quality, model generalizability, interpretability, clinical translation, and ethical and regulatory considerations. Finally, future research directions are outlined, including multimodal AI integration, incorporation of biomarkers, and the development of intelligent decision-support systems. Overall, AI is poised to play an increasingly important role in improving diagnostic accuracy and enabling personalized management of bladder cancer, thereby advancing the intelligent and data-driven management of urologic oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.