ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Genome-wide association study of corneal dystrophy uncovers novel risk loci and enables improved polygenic prediction of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To identify risk loci for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and improve a genetic risk prediction model. Design: Genome-wide association study (GWAS), polygenic risk score (PRS) construction, and TCF4 CTG18.1 short tandem repeat (STR) length inference. Participants: The study included 7,316 Europeans (EUR) with FECD or related corneal dystrophy phenotypes and 1,588,467 controls from the UK Biobank, All of Us, FinnGen, and the Million Veteran Program. Two independent EUR FECD cohorts were used for PRS validation (1,851/2,679 cases/controls and 124/257 cases/controls). African (AFR) ancestry analyses included 455 cases and 121,154 controls to build PRS. A subset of All of Us participants was used for joint PRS and STR modelling. Methods: GWAS meta-analyses were performed using FECD diagnoses or corneal dystrophy proxies where necessary, with validity assessed via genetic correlation. Risk loci were identified, and ancestry-specific PRSs were constructed using SBayesRC. PRS performance was evaluated across ancestries with and without TCF4 STR data. Main Outcome: We identified novel loci for corneal dystrophy and constructed PRS-based and STR-based prediction models. Results: The GWAS meta-analysis identified 24 risk loci associated with corneal dystrophy, including 12 novel loci, doubling previous FECD studies. The optimised PRS outperformed existing models in two independent FECD validation cohorts (AUC = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.82-0.84; DeLong's Conclusions: These findings refine the genetic architecture of FECD, enhance risk prediction, and support a tiered strategy integrating STR expansion testing with PRS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.