ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Clinical Performance of a Mp1p Antibody Detection Immunoassay For Talaromycosis.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Talaromycosis, caused by the fungus Methods: This diagnostic study included 423 adults with advanced HIV disease and culture-confirmed talaromycosis as cases, and 206 non-talaromycosis individuals with and without HIV who have never traveled to Asia as controls. Anti-Mp1p IgM and IgG antibodies were measured using conventional double-sandwich EIA. Diagnostic performance was assessed using the healthy control group and the HIV control group separately. Assay cut-offs were based on both the Youden index generated from the receiver operating characteristic curves, and separately using a pre-defined specificity of 95%. Results: At the pre-defined 95% specificity, IgM had low to moderate accuracy of 62.3% and 87.9%, and a low sensitivity of 8.3% and 21.3%, when evaluated with healthy and HIV controls, respectively. IgG had similarly low accuracy of 52.2% and 78.4%, and a low sensitivity of 21.5% and 30.5%, when evaluated using healthy and HIV controls, respectively. Both IgM and IgG assays performed better in HIV controls than healthy controls. Conclusions: The anti-Mp1p IgM and IgG EIAs show low utility for the diagnosis of acute talaromycosis. However, at the high specificity cut-off of 95%, the assays have utility in the detection of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.