ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Fault tree analysis-adapted knowledge structuring: a case study of sustainable international security cooperation.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sustainable knowledge transfer in Japan's international security cooperation for research and development (R&D) and procurement is challenging due to institutional and security constraints. Critical know-how is often tacit and dispersed among experts; continuity is undermined by frequent personnel rotations, temporal-spatial gaps between projects, and institutional and cultural differences across international partners, leading to knowledge loss. In this context, traditional on-the-job training is difficult to sustain, making durable knowledge transfer difficult to achieve. To overcome this problem, this study proposes a knowledge engineering method that externalizes practitioner expertise. Procedure-based knowledge (what/how) and purpose-based knowledge (why: purposes and decision rules) are structured as two auditable linked, machine-interpretable graphs-the procedure- and purpose-based knowledge graphs. This method uses the Convincing Human Action Rationalized Model (CHARM) as a notation for knowledge structuring. To articulate implicit causal reasoning, we integrate Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) as a qualitative, deductive elicitation and articulation notation. Starting from observed outcomes ("top events"), FTA deductively elicits avoidance purposes and candidate actions. These purpose-action pairs are then recorded under Reference Cases (RC) and embedded as RC-tagged links in the two graphs with FTA-derived annotations, thereby refining causal logic and facilitating knowledge externalization. We empirically assess the method's effectiveness through qualitative and quantitative analyses of data from semi-structured interviews, a facilitated workshop, and FTA-guided follow-up interviews. These activities increased both the volume and granularity of externalized knowledge, yielding 42 RCs and 133 case-attached actions as provenance-bearing purpose-action units. Our approach yields reusable, machine-interpretable assets for human-AI collaboration and may support continuity during constrained handovers, which may help mitigate repeated errors and improve negotiation preparedness. These findings suggest that the FTA-adapted CHARM approach can foster more sustainable knowledge transfer for Japan's international security cooperation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.