ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2025
Relative timing and coupling of neural population bursts in large-scale recordings from multiple neuron populations.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Population Coupling Model Identifies Reduced Propagation from V1 to Higher Visual Areas During Locomotion.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Temporal neural coupling: reconciling the Bobath concept with task-oriented training for post-stroke upper limb recovery-a perspective.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: The onset of a sensory stimulus elicits transient bursts of activity in neural populations, which are presumed to convey information about the stimulus to downstream populations. Although the timing at which these synchronized bursts reach their peak is highly variable across stimulus presentations, the relative timing of bursts across interconnected brain regions may be less variable, particularly for regions that are strongly functionally coupled. Methods: We developed a simple analytical framework that provides accurate trial-by-trial estimates of population burst times and of the correlations in the timing of evoked population bursts across areas. The method was evaluated using simulated data and compared to a recently published alternative model. We then applied the approach to large-scale Neuropixels recordings from six cortical visual areas and one visual thalamic nucleus in thirteen mice presented with drifting grating stimuli. Results: Our method performed well on simulated data and was 85-90% faster than the alternative model while being substantially easier to apply. Applied to real data, the approach enabled identification of mouse-to-mouse variation in both peak times and region-to-region functional coupling for the first two population bursts following stimulus onset. The observed timing relationships were consistent with known anatomy and physiology. Discussion: Examining sequences of activity across areas revealed that some timing relationships were preserved across all mice, while others varied across individuals. These findings demonstrate that the general approach can produce sensitive, trial-resolved analyses of timing relationships across neural populations and can capture both shared and individual-specific patterns of population burst propagation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.