ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2026
Conflicting invasive electrophysiological study results in a suspected fasciculoventricular pathway: a case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fasciculoventricular pathways (FVPs) are variants of pre-excitation syndrome with uncertain prevalence in the human heart. This case report presents findings from an invasive electrophysiological study (EPS) that mostly fulfil the established diagnostic criteria for FVP, but also exhibit atypical features, highlighting diagnostic ambiguity in clinical practice. Case summary: A 23-year-old patient presented with a history of brief, weekly episodes of palpitations. The resting surface ECG demonstrated a pre-excitation pattern suggestive of either a parahisian or fasciculoventricular pathway. The EPS findings were largely consistent with a FVP. During junctional beats, we observed a loss of pre-excitation and normalization of HV-interval. No tachycardia was inducible, and there was no evidence of retrograde conduction via an accessory pathway. Discussion: Three potential anatomical locations of the upper FVP take-off side were considered: (i) a single FVP originating from the lower part of the His-bundle or (ii) a single FVP originating close to the upper, junctional part of the His-bundle or even from the distal part of the AV-node and (iii) the presence of an additional second accessory pathway. Based on the above-mentioned evidence, the second anatomical location of the upper FVP-insertion was most likely, differing from previous findings of FVP in the literature. A conservative, observational management strategy was adopted. Current diagnostic criteria for FVP are based on retrospective studies and case reports, lacking prospective validation. This case underscores the need for further research to refine the diagnostic approach to FVP and improve risk stratification in such patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.