ArticleJournal of the Endocrine Society2026
Missed opportunities for risk reduction: type 1 diabetes management in older adults in DPV and T1DX-QI registries.
Article in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aims: To examine prescription of guideline-recommended therapies and achievement of treatment targets across the span of older adulthood in type 1 diabetes (T1D) in the United States and Germany/Austria. Materials and Methods: Cross-sectional data of adults aged ≥60 years with T1D for ≥1 year seen in 2022 in the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative (T1DX-QI) and the Diabetes Prospective Follow-up (DPV) registry. Descriptive statistics and within-registry comparisons across age groups using analysis of variance and chi-squared tests were used to analyze the data. Results: Thirty-six hundred adults aged ≥60 years, median age 67.5 [interquartile range (IQR) 63.4, 72.8] in T1DX-QI (n = 1549) and 68.9 (IQR 63.6, 75.7) in DPV (n = 2051) were included. The prevalence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (34.6% vs 16.8%) and chronic kidney disease (28.5% vs 11.8%) was higher in the DPV than the T1DX-QI. Lipid-lowering therapy for secondary prevention (52.9% vs 38%) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker use (55.3% vs 44.8%) were higher in the DPV. Continuous glucose monitoring use was similar (50.3% vs 47.9%), insulin pump use was >2 × higher (40.7% vs 17%), and automated insulin delivery use was >3 × higher (20.4% vs 6.4%) in the T1DX-QI as compared to the DPV. Conclusion: Despite a high prevalence of ASCVD and risks of hypoglycemia, guideline-recommended treatments including lipid-lowering therapy for secondary prevention and diabetes technologies were used in approximately half or fewer of older adults with T1D. Additional attention to prescribing and practices to support clinicians and older adults in the use of diabetes technologies is urgently needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.