ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2026
MountPat: investigations on the EEG signals.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To extract information from the brain, the most cost-effective method is electroencephalography (EEG) signal acquisition. Therefore, many researchers have used EEG signals to capture brain activity. EEG signals are complex; hence, computer-aided models-especially machine learning (ML)-are generally employed to interpret them. The primary objective of this research is to demonstrate the feature-extraction capability of a new, novel method. The proposed feature-extraction approach employs a deterministic feature-engineering transformation, designed to restructure multi-strided signal representations through fixed linear operations. The resulting transformation graph exhibits a mountain-like structure; therefore, we term the model MountPat. To evaluate MountPat's performance, we present an explainable feature engineering (XFE) model with four main phases. In the first phase, we extract informative features using MountPat. In the second phase, we select the most informative features using cumulative weighted iterative neighborhood component analysis (CWNCA). In the third phase, we generate classification results by applying t-algorithm-based k-nearest neighbors (tkNN). In the fourth phase, we extract explainable insights from the EEG signals using the Directed Lobish (DLob) explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) method. To demonstrate the general classification ability of the MountPat-based XFE framework, we use six EEG datasets. Under rigorous subject-independent (LOSO) validation, the model achieves 76.36%-98.88% accuracy, demonstrating strong cross-subject generalization. Sample-wise tenfold CV results exceed 89% on all six datasets. Moreover, by deploying the DLob XAI method, we generate interpretable results for each dataset. These results clearly illustrate that the MountPat-based XFE framework is an effective feature-extraction approach for multichannel signal processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.