Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41728208›Full record

ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2026

MountPat: investigations on the EEG signals.

Ugur Ince, Omer Faruk Goktas, Ilknur Sercek, Serkan Kirik, Prabal Datta Barua, Mehmet Baygin, Sengul Dogan, Turker Tuncer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ugur InceDepartment of Digital Forensics Engineering, College of Technology, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey.
Omer Faruk GoktasDepartment of Electronics and Automation, Technical Sciences Vocational School, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey.
Ilknur SercekDepartment of Digital Forensics Engineering, College of Technology, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey.
Serkan KirikDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Neurology, Fethi Sekin City Hospital, 23280 Elazig, Turkey.
Prabal Datta BaruaSchool of Business (Information System), University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia.
Mehmet BayginDepartment of Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, Erzurum Technical University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Sengul DoganDepartment of Digital Forensics Engineering, College of Technology, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey.
Turker TuncerDepartment of Digital Forensics Engineering, College of Technology, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To extract information from the brain, the most cost-effective method is electroencephalography (EEG) signal acquisition. Therefore, many researchers have used EEG signals to capture brain activity. EEG signals are complex; hence, computer-aided models-especially machine learning (ML)-are generally employed to interpret them. The primary objective of this research is to demonstrate the feature-extraction capability of a new, novel method. The proposed feature-extraction approach employs a deterministic feature-engineering transformation, designed to restructure multi-strided signal representations through fixed linear operations. The resulting transformation graph exhibits a mountain-like structure; therefore, we term the model MountPat. To evaluate MountPat's performance, we present an explainable feature engineering (XFE) model with four main phases. In the first phase, we extract informative features using MountPat. In the second phase, we select the most informative features using cumulative weighted iterative neighborhood component analysis (CWNCA). In the third phase, we generate classification results by applying t-algorithm-based k-nearest neighbors (tkNN). In the fourth phase, we extract explainable insights from the EEG signals using the Directed Lobish (DLob) explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) method. To demonstrate the general classification ability of the MountPat-based XFE framework, we use six EEG datasets. Under rigorous subject-independent (LOSO) validation, the model achieves 76.36%-98.88% accuracy, demonstrating strong cross-subject generalization. Sample-wise tenfold CV results exceed 89% on all six datasets. Moreover, by deploying the DLob XAI method, we generate interpretable results for each dataset. These results clearly illustrate that the MountPat-based XFE framework is an effective feature-extraction approach for multichannel signal processing.

Indexed as

Directed LobishEEG signal classificationExplainable artificial intelligenceExplainable feature engineeringMountain pattern

Identifiers

PMID41728208
PMCPMC12921105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.