Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41728191›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Chemical residues in tomato plant tissue and

Tshepo S Mashela, Ashwell R Ndhlala, Esam Elgorashi, Raymond T Makola

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tshepo S MashelaGreen Biotechnology and Innovation, Department of Plant Production, Soil Science and Agricultural Engineering, University of Limpopo, Polokwane, South Africa.
Ashwell R NdhlalaGreen Biotechnology and Innovation, Department of Plant Production, Soil Science and Agricultural Engineering, University of Limpopo, Polokwane, South Africa.
Esam ElgorashiToxicology and Ethnoveterinary Medicine, Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute, Agricultural Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
Raymond T MakolaBiochemistry, Microbiology and Technology Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry, University of Limpopo, Polokwane, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A shift from synthetic chemical nematicides to bionematicides in plant protection has led to the development of Nemarioc-AL and Nemafric-BL phytonematicides to manage plant parasitic nematodes. However, there is a lack of information on the accumulation of cucurbitacin residues and the cytotoxicity of phytonematicides on non-target entities. The aims of the study were to determine the cucurbitacin residue accumulation after the application of Nemarioc-AL and Nemafric-BL phytonematicides in tomato fruits and to determine their cytotoxic effects on a eukaryotic (Raw 264.7 cell line) model system. Two separate trials for Nemarioc-AL phytonematicide and Nemafric-BL phytonematicide, each applied at 3%, were conducted concurrently on sandy loam, dark soil, red soil, silt soil, sandy soil, and sandy loam (+). Each trial was arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) and replicated six times. 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2

Indexed as

antagonistbioactive substancecucurbitacin residuescytotoxicitynecrosisplant parasitic nematodes

Identifiers

PMID41728191
PMCPMC12916705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.