Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41728101›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2026

Outcomes of urgent gastrointestinal-related procedures in Latin America (LATAM-URG): a prospective multicentre study.

Latam Collaborative Colorectal Surgery Consortium, European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) Global Reach Committee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Latam Collaborative Colorectal Surgery Consortium
European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) Global Reach Committee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Urgent abdominal operations represent a large proportion of surgical care and are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Evidence is scarce from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Latin America (LA). The lack of regionally representative outcomes data hinders quality-improvement efforts and understanding of modifiable risk factors that could be targeted to improve urgent care. Methods: We present results from a prospective, multicenter observational cohort study of urgent abdominal surgery conducted in 14 countries across Latin America between February and December 2024. Eligible participants were consecutive adults (≥18 years) undergoing urgent gastrointestinal operations at each site during a 6-week inclusion window. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were reoperation, readmission, time to discharge, and prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay (defined as >72 h). Bayesian time-to-event models and Bayesian logistic regression were used to estimate associations between the outcomes and pre-specified covariates (age, sex, obesity, center volume, Charlson Comorbidity Index, SOFA score, surgical approach, operative time, prior abdominal surgery, intraoperative complications). Findings: A total of 1015 patients were included from 89 hospitals (mean age 58.3 years; 50.4% female and 49.6% male). The most common indications for surgery were intestinal obstruction (46.8%), perforation (23.4%), and abdominal abscess (9.6%). Overall 30-day mortality was 12.6% (128/1015) and one in three of these deaths occurred within 24 h of the index operation. Prolonged ICU stay occurred in 27.9% of patients, reoperation was required in 18.4% and readmission in 4.9%. Across all models, we consistently found an association between Charlson Comorbidity Index >3, SOFA score >3, and open surgical approach with higher odds or hazard of adverse postoperative outcomes, including death. Patients with SOFA >3 had substantially increased odds of prolonged ICU stay and higher hazard of reoperation and death. In contrast, open surgery was associated with longer hospitalization and more reoperations, as well as higher mortality. Interpretation: This large multi-country cohort provides the first region-wide estimates of outcomes after urgent abdominal surgery in Latin America. Mortality remains high, with almost one-third of all deaths occurring in the first 24 h after surgery. Patients' comorbidity burden, physiological derangement at presentation, and operative approach are all key determinants of outcome after urgent abdominal surgery. This evidence provides a baseline for quality-improvement efforts and highlights the urgent need for region-specific guidelines and protocols to standardize urgent surgical care across Latin America. Funding: This study received no external funding. All centers contributed in-kind resources, including personnel and data-collection infrastructure.

Indexed as

AbdominalGastrointestinalSurgeryUrgent

Identifiers

PMID41728101
PMCPMC12921494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.