ReviewExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2026
How can we balance risk and benefit of interleukin-18 armored T cell therapies?
Review in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next-generation CAR-T cell therapy against cancer: precision engineering, programmable immunity, and emerging clinical frontiers.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Review
- Review
- Re-Tooling of γδ T Cells for Cancer Immunotherapy Using Advanced Manufacturing and Genetic Engineering.Cells · 2026Review
- Multi-antigen chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy for relapsed/refractory B cell lymphomas.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CD19-specific CAR T cells engineered to secrete a constitutively active form of the pro-inflammatory cytokine, interleukin (IL)-18 have demonstrated impressive efficacy in a recent clinical trial involving subjects who had failed prior CAR T cell therapy. Corroborating these clinical data, preclinical studies of IL-18-armored CAR and T cell receptor-engineered T cells have demonstrated enhanced anti-tumor activity in several xenograft and syngeneic mouse cancer models. Interleukin-18 improves tumor clearance via direct effects on CAR T cells and indirect actions on cells on a variety of host immune cells, including natural killer, macrophage and dendritic cells. Compared to unarmored CAR T cells, IL-18-secreting CAR T cells are less exhausted, expand more efficiently and produce greater quantities of interferon (IFN)-γ. However, upregulated circulating IL-18 and its downstream mediator, IFN-γ, are also associated with systemic toxicities which have proven to be severe on occasions. In light of this, several groups have developed strategies that set out to restrict IL-18 release or biological activity to the tumor microenvironment. Among these, CAR T cells armored with NFAT-inducible IL-18 are now undergoing clinical testing. The evaluation of inducible or tumor-selective IL-18 deployment will show whether it is possible to minimize IL-18 related systemic toxicities while preserving localized amplification of anti-tumor activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.