ReviewGastroenterology report2026
Global patterns of disease progression in inflammatory bowel disease: a comprehensive synthesis of contemporary population-based cohorts.
Review in Gastroenterology report, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effects of a Nurse-Delivered Self-Management Program for Individuals with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Trial
- Real-world data on clinical response to inflammatory bowel disease biological treatments in patients with concurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis: a case-control study.Gastroenterology report · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), follow heterogeneous clinical trajectories. Although therapeutic options have expanded substantially over the past two decades, the extent to which modern treatment modifies long-term structural outcomes remains uncertain. We performed a targeted review focusing on high-quality population-based inception cohorts and large registries that report long-term outcomes in adult- and pediatric-onset IBD. Outcomes of interest included phenotype or extent progression, surgery, extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs), and colorectal neoplasia. CD consistently emerged as the more structurally progressive condition. Approximately one third of adults' progress from inflammatory to stricturing or penetrating disease within 5 years, and around half do so over longer follow-up. Perianal disease develops in 10%-20% of patients, with higher rates in pediatric-onset CD. Despite declines in surgical rates in the biologic era, intestinal resection remains frequent. In UC, proximal extension is the dominant progression pattern, affecting roughly one third of patients with limited disease over the first decade; pediatric UC shows even higher extension rates. Colectomy risks have markedly decreased in contemporary cohorts, and colorectal cancer incidence has declined compared with historical estimates, reflecting improved inflammation control and surveillance. Across IBD, EIMs occur in approximately one quarter of patients and cluster with extensive colonic involvement and higher systemic inflammatory burden. Population-based evidence reveals that IBD remains progressive in a substantial subset of patients, with notable differences between CD and UC and between adult and pediatric disease. Declining surgical and colorectal cancer rates suggest a measurable therapeutic era effect, supporting the importance of early, sustained inflammation control. However, high-quality prospective disease-modification trials are still needed to further characterize how current strategies can durably alter the natural history of IBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.