ReviewArabian journal for science and engineering2026
Generative Adversarial Networks for Intrusion Detection Systems: A Comprehensive Survey of Applications, Challenges, and Research Directions.
Review in Arabian journal for science and engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Evolving Security of the Internet of Vehicles: A Survey from Classical Machine Learning to Large Language Models, Adversarial Robustness, and Explainable AI.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- MOO-IDS: multi-objective optimization-based lightweight intrusion detection system for in-vehicle networks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Intrusion Detection in the Internet of Things: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques, Architectures, Datasets, and Emerging Trends.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Residual-guided hybrid framework for adversarially robust deep learning-based network intrusion detection.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evolving threat landscape demands intrusion detection systems that adapt quickly to novel attack patterns and operate across heterogeneous environments. Recent studies show that Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) can improve intrusion detection performance by generating synthetic attack traffic, balancing imbalanced datasets, enhancing adversarial robustness, and serving as anomaly detectors. This survey provides a comprehensive and systematic review of GAN-based intrusion detection system (IDS) research, analyzing the architectures employed-including Wasserstein GANs, conditional GANs, self-attention GANs, and specialized multi-generator designs-together with their applications, datasets, and evaluation metrics. Unlike previous surveys, we extend the scope to resource-constrained Internet of Things (IoT) and federated scenarios, where lightweight and tabular GANs can process sensor data and operate on edge devices. We also examine deployments in software-defined networking environments. We propose a unified evaluation framework that reports class-wise precision, recall and macro-F1-scores, per-attack metrics, computational cost, and statistical similarity tests, and we emphasize the need for interpretable and multi-modal approaches that fuse network flows with logs or threat intelligence. Emerging paradigms including GANs combined with large language models, quantum GANs, diffusion models, and reinforcement learning are surveyed, and open challenges such as training instability, mode collapse, hyper-parameter tuning, and ethical dual-use concerns are discussed. By synthesizing recent advances and outlining future research directions, this survey provides a comprehensive and forward-looking reference for practitioners and researchers developing robust, privacy-preserving, and adaptive GAN-based intrusion detection systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.