Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41728017›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025

Efficacy of blood copeptin level for the prediction of mortality of adult patients with sepsis: a meta-analysis.

Jiayang Huang, Tingting Niu, Huijie Shi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiayang Huang *Department of Pharmacy, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Tingting Niu *Department of Pharmacy, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Huijie ShiDepartment of Pharmacy, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Copeptin, the C-terminal fragment of provasopressin, has emerged as a potential prognostic biomarker in sepsis. However, its predictive accuracy for mortality in adult patients with sepsis remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of elevated blood copeptin levels for mortality prediction in this population. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang Data, and CNKI from inception to 22 May 2025, for observational studies assessing copeptin levels at admission or within 48 h in adults with sepsis. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated using a random-effects model. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. Results: Ten prospective studies involving 1,637 patients were included. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of elevated copeptin for predicting mortality were 0.77 (95% CI: 0.70-0.83; I Conclusion: Elevated blood copeptin levels within 48 h of sepsis diagnosis show good prognostic accuracy for short-term mortality in adult patients with sepsis. These findings support the potential clinical utility of copeptin as a risk stratification tool in sepsis management. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024587540.

Indexed as

bloodcopeptinmortalitypredictionsepsis

Identifiers

PMID41728017
PMCPMC12920574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.