SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
Efficacy of blood copeptin level for the prediction of mortality of adult patients with sepsis: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Copeptin, the C-terminal fragment of provasopressin, has emerged as a potential prognostic biomarker in sepsis. However, its predictive accuracy for mortality in adult patients with sepsis remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of elevated blood copeptin levels for mortality prediction in this population. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang Data, and CNKI from inception to 22 May 2025, for observational studies assessing copeptin levels at admission or within 48 h in adults with sepsis. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated using a random-effects model. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. Results: Ten prospective studies involving 1,637 patients were included. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of elevated copeptin for predicting mortality were 0.77 (95% CI: 0.70-0.83; I Conclusion: Elevated blood copeptin levels within 48 h of sepsis diagnosis show good prognostic accuracy for short-term mortality in adult patients with sepsis. These findings support the potential clinical utility of copeptin as a risk stratification tool in sepsis management. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024587540.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.