Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41728007›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Citizen science in plant disease surveillance.

Amelia Martin, Nicholas Goltz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amelia MartinUConn Plant Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.
Nicholas GoltzUConn Plant Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant diseases cause an estimated 30% annual crop yield loss worldwide, resulting in hundreds of billions of dollars in economic damage and increasingly threatening native and ornamental plants through global trade and environmental change. In the United States, the National Plant Diagnostic Network (NPDN) plays a critical role in safeguarding agricultural biosecurity; however, limited personnel and uneven diagnostic capacity highlight the need for new approaches to enhance disease surveillance. Citizen science, defined as public participation in scientific data collection, has proven effective in ecology and environmental monitoring but remains underutilized in plant pathology, prompting the need to assess its applicability in this field. This study represents the first national effort to evaluate citizen scientists' perspectives on participation in plant disease research. To address this objective, a nine-question online survey was distributed to approximately 500 individuals, including Master Gardeners, Extension professionals, and plant enthusiasts, yielding 233 completed responses. Results indicated strong interest in contributing to plant disease data collection, with participants emphasizing the importance of accessible education, diagnostic guidance, and user-friendly reporting platforms. Although challenges related to diagnostic accuracy and potential user bias persist, the findings suggest that structured training, educational support, and professional validation could enable citizen science to become a valuable tool for expanding plant disease surveillance. To the extent of our knowledge, this work provides the first evidence-based insight into citizen scientists' readiness to engage in plant disease monitoring and offers practical guidance for developing inclusive and effective plant health programs.

Indexed as

community initiativedisease detectiondisease monitoringplant healthqualitative data

Identifiers

PMID41728007
PMCPMC12916701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.