Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41728002›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Drought-tolerant rhizobacterial consortia enhance grapevine growth and tolerance to water deficit.

Ginevra Canavera, Gabriele Bellotti, Harsh Tiwari, Tommaso Frioni, Edoardo Puglisi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ginevra Canavera *Department of Sustainable Food Process, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.
Gabriele Bellotti *Department of Sustainable Food Process, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.
Harsh TiwariDepartment of Sustainable Crop Production, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.
Tommaso FrioniDepartment of Sustainable Crop Production, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.
Edoardo PuglisiDepartment of Sustainable Food Process, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In both natural ecosystems and in agroecosystems, Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) significantly contribute to plant development and stress mitigation through diverse mechanisms. In recent times, their application as microbial biostimulants (MBs) has gained attention, particularly for alleviating drought stress, which increasingly threatens grapevine productivity in both modern and traditional wine-growing regions. Despite this interest, functionally validated and biosafe PGPR consortia specifically tailored for grapevine remain limited. This study isolated drought-tolerant PGPRs from grapevine rhizosphere cultivated under contrasting environmental conditions and experiencing midday leaf water potentials between -1.3 and -1.4 MPa. The isolates were ranked according to their Plant Growth-Promoting Traits (PGPTs), and whole-genome sequencing was performed on the nine most promising strains to evaluate their functional potential and biosafety. Such functional traits are known to influence plant performance, providing a conceptual basis for evaluating their effects on grapevine growth. Based on their complementary PGPT profiles and demonstrated compatibility, these strains were assembled into four bacterial consortia (BC1-BC4). The consortia were applied by root dipping and soil inoculation to one-year-old grapevines subjected to progressive drought stress, in order to assess their potential synergistic effects on plant growth. Treated vines were compared to a non-inoculated control (NI). Results indicate that while BC1 and BC2 did not significantly impact shoot growth, BC3 and partially also BC4 increased shoot length by 35.5% and 26.5%, respectively, compared to NI. Notably, BC3 enhanced shoot elongation during the early phase under well-watered conditions, whereas BC4 conferred greater benefits under water deficit. After five days of suspended irrigation, BC4-treated vines maintained higher photosynthetic activity and stomatal conductance compared to all other treatments, which, displayed almost complete stomatal closure. This response may be linked to the enrichment of indole-3-acetic acid-producing and exopolysaccharide-forming strains, which are known to modulate plant growth and water status. Finally, both BC3 and BC4 promoted greater root biomass by the end of the pot trial. Overall, the results highlight the potential of rationally tailored PGPR consortia to enhance grapevine growth under both optimal and drought conditions, supporting their application as context-specific MBs for sustainable viticulture.

Indexed as

grapevinemicrobial biostimulantsplant adaptation and drought stress toleranceplant growth-promoting rhizobacteriarhizosphere microbiomewhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID41728002
PMCPMC12920203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.