Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41727993›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

A systems level framework for postharvest physiology and quality preservation.

María E García-Pastor, Natalia Falagán

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

María E García-PastorDepartment of Applied Biology, Institute for Agri-Food and Agro-Environmental Research and Innovation (CIAGRO), University Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain.
Natalia FalagánPlant Science Laboratory, Cranfield University, Cranfield, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The postharvest phase is critical for determining the quality, nutritional value, and market viability of fresh produce, yet global losses remain substantial, often exceeding 40%. This perspective aims to establish an integrated framework for understanding postharvest physiology and guiding sustainable quality preservation strategies. Deterioration is driven by complex molecular and physiological transformations, including ripening, senescence, and oxidative stress. Understanding these mechanisms is paramount for developing effective loss and waste reduction strategies. Metabolomics provides a systems level view of these changes, enabling the large scale profiling of small molecules and the identification of valuable biomarkers for quality loss, chilling injury, and senescence. Shifts in primary metabolites (sugars, organic acids) and the accumulation of 'off aroma' volatiles (ethanol, acetaldehyde) are critical indicators of decline. Also, preharvest factors (e.g. regulated deficit irrigation, signalling molecule application) fundamentally influence postharvest metabolic states by enhancing antioxidant capacity and delaying senescence. Molecular regulation, orchestrated by hormonal signalling (ethylene, abscisic acid) and transcription factors, underpins these shifts. Interventions focus on sustained redox homeostasis, often achieved through the exogenous application of ecofriendly signalling molecules like salicylic acid to upregulate enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant systems. Integrating multi-omics technologies (metabolomics, transcriptomics) facilitates the identification of molecular targets for these interventions and supports predictive modelling for optimising storage conditions. Translating these integrated insights into sustainable, biomarker based, farm to fork strategies is essential for enhancing food security and mitigating global greenhouse gas emissions associated with food loss.

Indexed as

food loss reductionfruit and vegetable qualitymetabolomicsmolecular mechanismspostharvest biologyripening and senescence

Identifiers

PMID41727993
PMCPMC12920525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.