Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41727975›Full record

ArticleNational science review2026

Manipulating fractional Shapiro steps in twisted cuprate Josephson junctions.

Yuying Zhu, Heng Wang, Ding Zhang, Qi-Kun Xue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in National science review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuying ZhuBeijing Key Laboratory of Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing, Beijing Academy of Quantum Information Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Heng WangState Key Laboratory of Quantum Functional Materials, Department of Physics, and Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Quantum Science, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Ding ZhangBeijing Key Laboratory of Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing, Beijing Academy of Quantum Information Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8334-8349
Qi-Kun XueBeijing Key Laboratory of Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing, Beijing Academy of Quantum Information Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-quality Josephson junctions made of twisted cuprate superconductors offer unprecedented opportunities in addressing fundamental problems and realizing next-generation superconducting devices at relatively high temperatures. Whether or not the twisted cuprates possess high-temperature topological superconductivity remains an outstanding issue. Here, we tackle this problem via an in-depth study of the key predicted feature-half-integer Shapiro steps. We show that half-integer Shapiro steps do occur in samples at a twist angle of 45°, but they are unstable, with thermal cycling. Interestingly, fractional steps can be introduced by training the sample with a small magnetic field or annealing with a large electrical current, attesting to a tunable current-phase relation (CPR) in twisted cuprates. We also extend the current annealing to realize fractional steps with odd denominators. Furthermore, half-integer steps can be induced in the regime that is well beyond the expectation of topological superconductivity, favoring an alternative mechanism involving trapped vortices. Our results not only caution the direct association of half-integer Shapiro steps with the exotic mechanism, but also open a distinct pathway toward a Josephson junction with an electrically tunable CPR at high temperatures.

Indexed as

high-temperature superconductivityJosephson effectShapiro stepstwisted systems

Identifiers

PMID41727975
PMCPMC12917811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.