ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026
Cartilage thickness at the apex of femoral resections in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty is close to 2.5 millimeters.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Determining the correct resection thickness on worn femoral surfaces in kinematically aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is uncertain since cartilage thickness is unknown. In the past, a 2 mm fixed adjustment has been used, but this may not reflect cartilage thickness at the apices of resections. Our objectives were to determine apex thickness for each resection based on a new method involving MR images, compare this thickness to direct measurements using calibrated photographs, and determine whether an increase in the 2 mm fixed adjustment is a refinement of interest to an already highly successful surgical procedure. Methods: MR images from 100 knees without evidence of OA were accessed in the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) database. After aligning images in kinematic planes, the apices of the distal and posterior femoral resections were identified, and the apex cartilage thickness was computed. Results: From MR images and calibrated photographs, respectively, apex cartilage thickness was 2.3 mm ± 0.5 mm vs. 2.6 mm ± 0.7 mm for the distal medial resection, 2.3 mm ± 0.4 mm vs. 2.7 mm ± 0.6 mm for the distal lateral resection, 2.4 mm ± 0.5 mm vs. 2.7 mm ± 0.6 mm for the posterior medial resection, and 2.4 mm ± 0.6 mm vs 2.5 mm ± 0.5 mm for the posterior lateral resection. Mean differences were statistically significant ( Conclusions: Apex cartilage thickness for MR image measurements was closer to 2.5 mm than 2 mm for all four resections. Apex cartilage thickness for calibrated photographs was greater than 2.5 mm and was comparable for all four resections. Although unlikely to affect patient-reported outcome measures, a fixed adjustment for worn cartilage on the femur in KA TKA of 2.5 mm is a refinement of interest to bring more patients closer to the ideal alignment. Level of Evidence: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.