ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026
Success in Gingival Recession Coverage: Prognostic Indicators From Private Practice.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Success in Gingival Recession Coverage: Prognostic Indicators From Private Practice.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To identify parameters associated with successful root coverage, defined as 70% and 50% root coverage in Miller Class I-II/RT1 and III/RT2 defects, respectively, within periodontal office settings. Methods: Dental records of patients treated for gingival recessions were screened retrospectively. General health parameters, smoking status, pre and posttreatment recession depth (RD), that is, RD and residual RD (RRD), respectively, recession width (RW), keratinized tissue (KT) width, and clinical attachment loss (CAL) were extracted. Logistic regression linear mixed-effects models were used to identify correlations between patient- and treatment-specific variables and the success of gingival recession defect coverage up to 180 months. Results: Records from 105 surgically treated recessions (82 Miller Class-I-II/RT1, 23 Miller Class-III/RT2) in 56 patients (46 females, 10 males) were retrieved. Mean follow-up was 3.52 (1-15) years post-surgery. Smoking, Miller Class II/RT1 and III/RT2, and lateral teeth were negatively associated with treatment success (effect sizes: smoking -21.0, Miller II/RT1 -21.5, Miller III/RT2 -21.4, lateral -21.1; all Conclusions: Long-term root coverage is negatively correlated with smoking, Miller Class II-III/RT1-2 recessions, and lateral teeth but positively related to canines and first premolars. CAL/KT gain and RRD are positively influenced by initial RD, RW, and Miller Class-III/RT2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.