ArticleFrontiers in urology2026
Extraplanar ultrasound-guided multi-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective comparative study in patients with complex nephrolithiasis.
Article in Frontiers in urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of extraplanar ultrasound (USG) guidance with the conventional technique in multi-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for managing complex renal stones (CRS). Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 91 patients diagnosed with CRS treated with multi-tract PCNL between May 2017 and December 2020. Patients were divided into the conventional USG group and the extraplanar USG group. Patient demographics and operative characteristics were compared, acknowledging the baseline stone size imbalance as a potential confounder. Results: Fifty-one (56.0%) patients received extraplanar USG-guided PCNL. The median maximum stone diameter in the conventional group was significantly larger (30 vs. 22 mm, p = 0.001). All tracts were established successfully. Despite larger stones, the conventional group had significantly longer operative times (145 vs. 108 min, p = 0.001). No significant difference was observed in stone-free rates (55% vs. 57%). The extraplanar group showed significantly lower postoperative serum creatinine levels (80 vs. 87 μmol/L, p = 0.03) and shorter hospital stays (8 vs. 10 days, p = 0.01). Postoperative fever occurred in four patients in the extraplanar group (8% vs. 0%, p = 0.07). Conclusions: Multi-tract PCNL performed under extraplanar USG guidance is safe and efficacious for CRS management. The technique optimizes the puncture strategy, offering superior operative efficiency and potential nephron preservation despite baseline stone load differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.