ArticleSAGE open medicine2026
Associations of blood cell indices with the risk of ankylosing spondylitis: A retrospective case-control and machine learning modeling study.
Article in SAGE open medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ankylosing spondylitis often presents with nonspecific symptoms, making the identification of high-risk individuals challenging in clinical practice. Objective: This study aimed to utilize blood cell indices to construct interpretable machine learning models to assist in clinical triage and the identification of patients at high risk for ankylosing spondylitis. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted involving 17,504 participants, comprising 4903 patients with ankylosing spondylitis and 12,601 controls with low back pain. Recursive feature elimination was applied to identify key variables, and six machine learning models were developed to diagnose ankylosing spondylitis using blood cell indices. The best-performing model was identified and compared with established biomarkers through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. External validation was carried out using data from the Fourth People's Hospital of Nanning. The SHapley Additive Explanations method was applied to interpret the model and evaluate the contribution of individual indices to diagnostic predictions. In addition, to examine the independent associations between blood cell indices and ankylosing spondylitis risk while minimizing selection bias, propensity score matching was conducted, followed by binary logistic regression on the matched cohort. Results: Among the diagnostic models, the light gradient boosting machine model demonstrated the best performance, with areas under the curve of 0.866 in the test set and 0.872 in the external validation set. Several blood cell indices showed significant associations with ankylosing spondylitis. Conclusion: The light gradient boosting machine model exhibited reliable diagnostic performance for ankylosing spondylitis, and interpretable machine learning approaches provided insights into the contributions of specific hematologic parameters. These findings suggest that blood cell indices, as inexpensive and widely available markers, may serve as a tool for clinical triage and prioritizing high-risk individuals for further diagnostic evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.