ArticleRadiology case reports2026
Cyclopia: Facial deformity indicating severe holoprosencephaly with imaging findings of brain: A case report.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Holoprosencephaly results from incomplete separation of the cerebral hemispheres. Cyclopia is a facial manifestation of Holoprosencephaly, characterized by a midline single orbit and proboscis. Prenatal diagnosis is done by ultrasonography and can be supplemented by MRI. This case uniquely presents ultrasound and gross morphology correlation of cyclopia in a resource limited setting, and a correlation between facial features, intra-cranial anatomy, and lifespan. We report a 39-year-old gravida 3 para 2 woman with a history of alcohol consumption who presented for her first antenatal checkup at 19 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound revealed a single lateral ventricle with fused thalami, absent orbital structures, and a midline cystic protrusion (proboscis). After thorough counseling, pregnancy was terminated, and cyclopia was confirmed on gross inspection. Karyotyping and fetal echocardiography were not done due to parental preference. Alobar holoprosencephaly, the most severe subtype, is diagnosed by identification of single ventricle and associated facial anomalies. Lobar holoprosencephaly, however, requires coronal imaging to demonstrate absence of cavum septum pellucidum and fusion of frontal horns. The severity of facial anomalies correlates with underlying brain malformations. Chromosomal anomalies, maternal diabetes, infections, and teratogenic exposures like alcohol are known risk factors. Differential diagnoses include proboscis lateralis, midline encephaloceles and frontonasal dysplasia. This case highlights the prognostic significance of facial and brain anomalies and diagnostic utility of prenatal ultrasound in diagnosing holoprosencephaly underscoring the necessity of timely prenatal visits. Definitive genomic studies were not feasible, but maternal alcohol consumption can be considered as a possible risk factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.