Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41727818›Full record

ArticleClinical psychology in Europe2025

I'm Still Standing: Body Sway, Interpersonal Distance, and Social Anxiety - A Proof of Principle.

Wolf-Gero Lange, Muriel A Hagenaars

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical psychology in Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wolf-Gero LangeBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4236-0819
Muriel A HagenaarsDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5674-6966

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Cognitive models suggest that individuals with high degrees of social anxiety (SAs) tend to incorrectly interpret (ambiguous) social cues as negative evaluations and thus justifying their fears. It is assumed that subtle behaviors of SAs may give rise to factual negative evaluations, but it is unclear which kind of behaviors that may be. We tested whether automatic motivational behavior becomes disrupted when degree of social anxiety increases, expecting higher social anxiety to be associated with more threat-related 'freezing' (reduction of body sway) and backward leaning (avoidance). Method: Of 87 participants with varying degrees of social anxiety, body sway was recorded by means of a stabilometric platform, while a fe-/male experimenter was gradually approaching. Results: Higher levels of social anxiety were related to an Limitations: Predictability of set-up and knowledge of escape options may have undermined participants' experience of the situation as highly socially threatening. Unease-, rather than fear-related behavior may have been the result. Conclusions: The results indicate that SAs seem to show an increase in uneasy, nervous movement when approached by strangers. Whether that provokes the negative evaluation SAs fear most, still needs to be investigated.

Indexed as

avoidancebody swayfreezing behaviorinterpersonal distancesocial anxietystabilometric force platform

Identifiers

PMID41727818
PMCPMC12923200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.