Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41727710›Full record

ArticleCogent mental health2026

An identity-based cognitive model of self-schemata, perceived social support and paranoid ideation: data from lesbian, gay and bisexual individuals.

Barbara Lopes, Rusi Jaspal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cogent mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Barbara LopesUniversity of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1400-020X
Rusi JaspalUniversity of Brighton, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8463-9519

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) people experience mental health inequalities but there are limited data on paranoid ideation in this population. Using cross-sectional survey data from 257 LGB people, this study tests an identity-based cognitive model of self-schemata, perceived social support and paranoid ideation. Specifically, it examines associations between the maladaptive self-schemata of uncertainty intolerance and rejection sensitivity and paranoid ideation directly and indirectly through the mediation of perceived social support, as well as the moderating role of the adaptive self-schema of identity resilience. An advanced moderated mediation generalized linear model (GLM) showed that uncertainty intolerance and rejection sensitivity were associated directly and positively with paranoid ideation and indirectly through the mediation of lower perceived social support. In addition to directly and negatively impacting paranoia, identity resilience moderated these direct and indirect relationships, essentially weakening the associations between the maladaptive self-schemata and paranoid ideation, the maladaptive self-schemata and lower perceived social support and lower perceived social support and paranoid ideation. Identity resilience may perform protective effects against paranoia notwithstanding the presence of maladaptive self-schemata.

Indexed as

identity resilienceparanoid ideationperceived social supportrejection sensitivityUncertainty intolerance

Identifiers

PMID41727710
PMCPMC12918275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.