ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2026
Economic evaluation of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors in advanced hormonal receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative breast cancer: a nationwide budget impact analysis.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Several trials demonstrated improvements in clinical outcomes associated with cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors in breast cancer patients. The challenge remains regarding their high costs. Ribociclib and Abemaciclib are cost-effective in Qatar. Yet, their affordability was not studied. This budget impact analysis (BIA) is to assess the affordability of adopting CDK4/6 inhibitors in Qatar over five years duration (2024-2028). Methods: We ran a BIA to evaluate two scenarios: (1) Increasing abemaciclib's market share from 20% to 60%, replacing both palbociclib and ribociclib. (2) Assuming equal market share for both ribociclib and abemaciclib up to 80%, reducing palbociclib's share. The analysis considered treatment costs, patient population, and disease prevalence. All data were retrieved from the National Center for Cancer Care and Research, and costs were presented in Qatari Riyals (QAR). Sensitivity analyses were run to ensure the robustness of the conclusion. All results were compared to Qatar's budget threshold, which is QAR 453,822. Results: Based on a total of 173 patients using CDK4/6 inhibitors, increasing abemaciclib's market share to 60% yielded cumulative savings of QAR 14 million over five years, which is around QAR 14,613 per patient per year. However, equally increasing ribociclib's and abemaciclib's market share to 80% resulted in a modest budget increase, remaining within acceptable thresholds. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings, showing that cost reductions and higher uptake rates further enhanced savings. Conclusion: Abemaciclib is a budget-saving option for HR+/HER2- breast cancer in Qatar, should it replace the market share by up to 60% over five years. In addition, ribociclib and abemaciclib are affordable treatment options if they equally contributes to up to 80% of the market share for the eligible advanced breast cancer patients. The results supported the concept of allocating CDK4/6 inhibitors as they were found to be affordable to the Qatari healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.