ArticlePCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2026
Safety and efficacy of zuranolone in Japanese adults with major depressive disorder: An open-label, repeated-treatment part of a Phase 3 clinical trial.
Article in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of repeating 14-day treatment with zuranolone (30 mg) followed by a 6-week follow-up period (one treatment cycle) for a maximum of six treatment cycles in Japanese participants with major depressive disorder. Methods: This multicenter Phase 3 study was conducted in two parts (70 sites; Japan). Part B was an open-label study for participants who completed the initial double-blind study (Part A; zuranolone vs. placebo) in which all eligible participants received zuranolone regardless of their assignments in Part A. Endpoints included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and efficacy using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17). Results: A total of 271, 213, 170, 147, 126, and 99 participants were evaluated in Cycles 1-6, respectively. TEAEs occurring in ≥5% of participants were somnolence and dizziness during the treatment period and nasopharyngitis during the follow-up period, and no new safety signals were observed with increased numbers of treatment cycles. Additionally, no TEAEs suggestive of drug dependence or withdrawal symptoms were identified. The HAMD-17 total score decreased by 8 and 15 days after the initiation of zuranolone in all six cycles, and there were no meaningful differences in the HAMD-17 total score reduction across treatment cycles. Conclusion: In this open-label part of the Phase 3 study in Japan, zuranolone decreased the HAMD-17 total scores from baseline over 15 days during repeated treatment cycles in patients with major depressive disorder, without any new safety signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.