ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Histopathology images-based deep learning prediction of prognosis in primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurately predicting the prognosis of primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma (PMOC) remains a significant challenge in gynecologic oncology. This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning model using histopathological images for precise prognostic prediction and risk stratification in PMOC. Methods: Histopathological slides of PMOC patients were retrospectively collected and digitized into whole-slide images (WSIs). A graph-based deep learning survival model was established by integrating histological feature extraction, spatial graph construction, and survival prediction through graph neural networks (GNN) combined with Cox proportional hazards modeling. Patients were subsequently stratified into high- and low-risk groups based on model-generated risk scores. The model's prognostic performance was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression. Interpretability was evaluated through GNNExplainer-generated heatmaps. Results: A total of 80 patients (148 WSIs) were included from three medical centers. The best-performing deep learning model achieved a mean C-index of 0.8254 and stratified patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. Patients in the high-risk group demonstrated significantly shorter overall survival (OS) than those in the low-risk group (log-rank Conclusions: This deep learning model offers accurate prognostic predictions from histopathology, presenting a promising tool to improve risk stratification and guide personalized treatment in PMOC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.