ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Outcome of elective cemiplimab discontinuation in locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma patients achieving a complete remission.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cemiplimab treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma induced rapid and deep tumor regressions. The majority of our cemiplimab-treated patients achieved a complete remission. It was not clear how long cemiplimab therapy should be continued in these patients, to prevent a subsequent relapse. Materials and Methods: We identified cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma patients who were treated with cemiplimab via a computer database search. Individual patient records were then reviewed to identify patients who had achieved a radiographically or pathologically confirmed complete remission. Following elective treatment discontinuation based on our institutional standard, the outcomes of these patients were analyzed. Results: Complete remissions were achieved in 15 out of 21 patients (71.4%) following cemiplimab treatment. The median treatment duration was only 5.3 ± 3.7 months (or 8.0 ± 3.6 doses of cemiplimab). With a median follow-up of 48.5 months following elective treatment discontinuation, only one of 15 patients experienced a delayed relapse. The other 14 patients have remained in a durable complete remission. Discussion: Our retrospective data review demonstrated that early elective cemiplimab discontinuation was both feasible, and safe. There was a low risk of relapse if patients achieve a radiologically or pathologically documented complete remission. We believe that decreases in the duration of cemiplimab treatment has the potential to reduce the risk of delayed checkpoint inhibitor toxicity, as well as decreasing treatment costs. Confirmation of our encouraging findings in a prospective clinical trial is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.