ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Optimal timing of surgery in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Timing of surgery after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Current evidence, surgical implications, and a research agenda.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Our goal was to evaluate the influence of the interlude between neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NAIC) and surgery on both pathologic responses and surgical outcomes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Methods: Patients undergoing surgery for HNSCC following NAIC were retrospectively enrolled and determined based on the time to surgery (TTS). Impact of TTS on major pathologic response (mPR), pathologic complete response (pCR), surgical complication and 3-year disease free survival (DFS) was evaluated. Results: A total of 356 patients were enrolled. 225 patients (63.2%) achieved a mPR, among whom a pCR was achieved in 104 patients (29.2%). When compared to the TTS<1 week group, patients with a TTS of 1-2 weeks and those with a TTS of 2-3 weeks exhibited comparable rates of pCR and mPR achievement; however, patients who underwent surgery more than 3 weeks after the completion of NAIC had a significantly reduced likelihood of achieving total tumor regression by 16% (95% CI: 1%-23%) and lower probability of major tumor regression by 21% (95% CI: 5%-36%). The TTS >3 weeks group bore an additional 0.67-fold risk of experiencing surgical complications and 1.23-fold increased risk of adverse recurrence or death events compared to TTS <1 cohort. Conclusion: A TTS exceeding 3 weeks was independently associated with a diminished likelihood of achieving both pCR and mPR, an increased rate of surgical complications, and a shorter duration of DFS. These findings suggest that the interval between surgery and the completion of NAIC may be optimal when kept within 3 weeks in HNSCC, though this warrants prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.