ArticleResearch square2026
PARQ: A Complexity-Consensus Aware Automatic Assessment of Motor Disease Severity in Parkinson's Disease.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Parkinson's Disease (PD) is the fastest growing neurodegenerative disease, creating an urgent need for scalable objective clinical approaches to assess and monitor cardinal PD features (bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor, and gait dysfunction). Currently, the evaluation of PD features relies on expert assessments using the Movement Disorders Society - Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (MDS-UPDRS-III), which provides a standardized framework for quantifying motor disease severity. However, this approach relies on the availability and expertise of trained clinicians, limiting scalability and introducing variability related to the experience of the raters and task-specific complexity. Inter-rater variability arises from a fundamental consensus-complexity tradeoff inherent to visually rated motor tasks: tasks with less visual cues tend to elicit lower inter-rater variability (greater rater agreement) whereas tasks with more visual cues are associated with greater disagreement. To address these challenges, we introduce PARQ, a deep learning based platform to automatically quantify PD motor disease severity from routine clinical videos. Rather than predicting a single severity score, PARQ estimates both the expected motor severity and the underlying distribution of expert ratings, enabling task-specific, consensus-aware motor severity prediction. We evaluate PARQ on a clinical dataset of 48 patients across 8 tasks with three independent expert ratings per video. PARQ achieves 90% accuracy on high-consensus tasks and 80% on low-consensus tasks, demonstrating robustness to systematic rater disagreement. PARQ delivers task-specific, distribution-aware severity estimates across most visually rated MDS-UPDRS-III tasks, offering a foundation for objective PD motor disease severity assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.