Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41727577›Full record

ArticleResearch square2026

Continuous input drives motor cortical dynamics during reaching.

Hongwei Mao, Brady A Hasse, Andrew B Schwartz

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hongwei MaoDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7287-8291
Brady A HasseDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5273-3092
Andrew B SchwartzDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.

Funding

Motor cortical signaling of impedance during manipulationR01NS111148 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SCHWARTZ, ANDREW B. · 2020 to 2024
$2.8M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS111148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a departure from current models of autonomous cortical activity, we examined the effect of continuous input on the dynamic activity of motor cortical neurons throughout a reaching task. We found a series of distinct state transitions in the firing rates of these recorded neural populations. We then asked whether these changes in state were due to internal processing in the motor cortex, as previous models would suggest, or to continuous external inputs. In other words, were signals coming from outside the motor cortex the main drivers of neural activity during reaching behavior? To answer this question, we used hybrid neural networks (HNNs)-consisting of a mixture of artificial connectivity and empirical firing rates-to construct realistic model systems. The HNNs faithfully produced the firing rates of the individual neurons and the state transitions of the populations we recorded, with extrinsic input consisting of episodically modulated neurons. Instead of the reported primacy of intrinsic action, we found that input from extrinsic sources was responsible for these results. Episodic external drive produced consistent changes in the statistics of pre-threshold input integration to cause the state transitions. By using HNNs with empirically constrained connectivity, we have shown that continuous input is a plausible agent for broad system functionality.

Identifiers

PMID41727577
PMCPMC12919204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.