ArticleResearch square2026
Continuous input drives motor cortical dynamics during reaching.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In a departure from current models of autonomous cortical activity, we examined the effect of continuous input on the dynamic activity of motor cortical neurons throughout a reaching task. We found a series of distinct state transitions in the firing rates of these recorded neural populations. We then asked whether these changes in state were due to internal processing in the motor cortex, as previous models would suggest, or to continuous external inputs. In other words, were signals coming from outside the motor cortex the main drivers of neural activity during reaching behavior? To answer this question, we used hybrid neural networks (HNNs)-consisting of a mixture of artificial connectivity and empirical firing rates-to construct realistic model systems. The HNNs faithfully produced the firing rates of the individual neurons and the state transitions of the populations we recorded, with extrinsic input consisting of episodically modulated neurons. Instead of the reported primacy of intrinsic action, we found that input from extrinsic sources was responsible for these results. Episodic external drive produced consistent changes in the statistics of pre-threshold input integration to cause the state transitions. By using HNNs with empirically constrained connectivity, we have shown that continuous input is a plausible agent for broad system functionality.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.