SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Differential cardiovascular benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors, sacubitril/valsartan, omecamtiv mecarbil, and vericiguat across heart failure phenotypes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age-related differences in the intake of heart failure therapy among participants from the MyoVasc study.European geriatric medicine · 2026Observational
- Beyond the Four Pillars: A Risk-Targeted Framework for Vericiguat-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The study evaluated the cardiovascular outcomes associated with pharmacological treatments in heart failure (HF) patients and explored whether the benefits/risks associated with these drugs for HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFmrEF/HFpEF) were consistent with HF with reduced EF (HFrEF). Methods: Several online databases were searched. All studies explored the cardiovascular effects of sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), sacubitril/valsartan, omecamtiv mecarbil and vericiguat were screened and reviewed. Results: A total of 39 studies were included. Compared with placebo therapy, SGLT2i significantly reduced cardiovascular death and hospitalization for HF (HHF) in both HFrEF and HFmrEF/HFpEF patients (approximately 13%-27% risk reduction). SGLT2i reduced serious adverse events across all HF types. Sacubitril/valsartan demonstrated significant benefits in HFrEF patients, reducing cardiovascular death by 19%, all-cause mortality by 22%, and HHF by 22%. However, these benefits were not observed in HFmrEF/HFpEF patients. In contrast, sacubitril/valsartan substantially increased hypotension risk in HFmrEF/HFpEF patients. Omecamtiv mecarbil and vericiguat tended to improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HF, but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: SGLT2i represents an effective and safe treatment strategy across the HF spectrum. Sacubitril/valsartan significantly improves outcomes in HFrEF but requires careful benefit-risk evaluation in HFmrEF/HFpEF patients. Current evidence does not support routine use of omecamtiv mecarbil or vericiguat. Large-scale randomized trials are warranted to validate these findings. Systematic review registration: CRD42023455966.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.