ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Dengue-SARS-CoV-2 interactions: immune crosstalk, variant emergence, and clinical outcomes.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Proteomic signals are not equal clinical phenotypes: redefining evidence standards in arbovirus-SARS-CoV-2 cross-reactivity.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review aims to provide an overview of dengue-COVID-19 co-infection, emphasizing recently described immunological, genomic, and eco-epidemiological interactions that may influence clinical outcomes and viral evolution. It brings together molecular evidence, immunological perspectives, and epidemiological insights to summarize current hypotheses and working models of these complex disease interactions. We summarize and critically discuss evidence on antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), cross-reactive immune responses, and cytokine amplification pathways, and propose mechanisms that could underlie exacerbated disease severity. Published clinical data indicate heterogeneity in co-infection outcomes globally, from mild presentations to severe complications, such as hemorrhagic stroke, acute kidney injury, and increased mortality, particularly among populations with prior dengue exposure. Diagnostic complexities arising from serological cross-reactivity underscore the need for simultaneous molecular testing to ensure accurate pathogen identification. Additionally, we review current evidence on reciprocal selective pressures between SARS-CoV-2 variants and dengue serotypes, highlighting potential evolutionary impacts arising from their co-circulation. The available evidence suggests that co-infection may exacerbate inflammatory pathways, lead to increased vascular and organ damage, and complicate patient management. However, definitive clinical evidence for ADE remains inconclusive, underscoring an ongoing need for targeted mechanistic studies. By outlining significant knowledge gaps and summarizing proposed research directions, this review aims to provide a valuable reference for clinicians, immunologists, epidemiologists, and policymakers managing concurrent dengue and COVID-19 outbreaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.