Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41727401›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Efficacy and safety of toludesvenlafaxine hydrochloride sustained-release tablets in depression with ineffective or partially effective initial antidepressant treatment: a single-arm, multicenter clinical study.

Jingming Yang, Yanyan Jia, Ke Chen, Weiye Liang, Jing Long, Meijuan Li, Qianqian Wei, Jian Wang, Baoping Yan, Keqing Li and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jingming Yang *Department of Psychiatry, Beijing Huilongguan Hospital, Peking University Huilongguan Clinical Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yanyan Jia *Department of Psychiatry, Beijing Huilongguan Hospital, Peking University Huilongguan Clinical Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ke ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, Beijing Huilongguan Hospital, Peking University Huilongguan Clinical Medical College, Beijing, China.
Weiye LiangDepartment of Psychiatry, Beijing Changping Mental Health Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jing LongDepartment of Psychology, Tianjin Anding Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Meijuan LiDepartment of Psychology, Tianjin Anding Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Qianqian WeiDepartment of Psychology, Tianjin Anding Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Jian WangDepartment of Pharmacology, Hebei Provincial Mental Health Center, The Sixth Clinical Medical College of Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei, China.
Baoping YanDepartment of Pharmacology, Hebei Provincial Mental Health Center, The Sixth Clinical Medical College of Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei, China.
Keqing LiDepartment of Pharmacology, Hebei Provincial Mental Health Center, The Sixth Clinical Medical College of Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei, China.
Jie LiDepartment of Psychology, Tianjin Anding Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Fude YangDepartment of Psychiatry, Beijing Huilongguan Hospital, Peking University Huilongguan Clinical Medical College, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Depression is one of the leading causes of avoidable suffering worldwide, and over 50% of patients do not respond to their first antidepressant treatment, which underscores the need for more effective alternatives. This clinical predicament urgently requires an effective solution. The core objective of this study is to clarify the clinical efficacy and application value of the triple reuptake inhibitor toludesvenlafaxine in patients with poor response to the first antidepressant therapy, providing a new basis for treatment options for this refractory group. Methods: This multicenter study included 61 patients meeting Results: For such patients that did not respond to the first treatment, significant and rapid efficacy was demonstrated after switching to toludesvenlafaxine. At 8 weeks of treatment, the average MADRS score of the patients decreased by 15.5 points compared with the baseline (95% CI, -17.7 to -13.3; Conclusion: This study confirmed that toludesvenlafaxine not only has significant clinical efficacy (including early onset, high remission, and response) for patients with depression who did not respond to the first antidepressant treatment, but also has good safety and can improve sexual dysfunction that affects compliance. This result highlights the significant position of toludesvenlafaxine in addressing the key clinical challenge of first treatment failure, providing a highly valuable new option for the subsequent treatment of such patients.

Indexed as

clinical efficacyinitial antidepressantswitching strategiestoludesvenlafaxinetreatment-resistant depressive disorder

Identifiers

PMID41727401
PMCPMC12917316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.