ArticleACS measurement science au2026
Rapid Detection of Nanoplastic Contamination in Plastic Labware by Dynamic Light Scattering Highlights Variations in Experimental Precision.
Article in ACS measurement science au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optical, Chemical, and Biological Detection Methods of Microplastics and Nanoplastics.ACS measurement science au · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanoplastics (NPs) are emerging contaminants of environmental concern, raising significant alarms due to their prevalence and potential health risks. Unlike larger microplastics, NPs are challenging to detect due to their nanodimensions and the reliance on labor-intensive methods such as nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) or scanning electron microscopy (SEM). This underscores the urgent need for rapid and accessible detection methods. To address these challenges, we employed dynamic light scattering (DLS), a widely used technique for measuring nanoparticle sizes, to rapidly quantify NP concentrations and sizes. Using DLS, we demonstrated the prevalence of NPs originating from laboratory-based plastic consumables such as microcentrifuge tubes, cryovials, and Petri dishes. Notably, routine actions, including pipet-tip scraping against plastic labware during sample handling, can introduce NPs into solutions. Moreover, physical or chemical procedures, especially sonication and liquid nitrogen treatment, further exacerbate the NP release. This interfered with experimental outcomes, including skewing of DNA and iron nanoparticle concentrations. Our material analysis revealed that the NPs were made of polystyrene and polypropylene, which correlated to manufacturers' product details. Hence, our study highlights an under-recognized NP source that compromises research integrity while contributing to global NP pollution, thus emphasizing the need for sustainable laboratory practices and robust contamination control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.