ArticleACS measurement science au2026
Validation of Dried Saliva for Molecular Diagnostics.
Article in ACS measurement science au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A pivotal moment for the development of point of care diagnostics for COVID-19 was the validation of sample types that were alternatives to nasopharyngeal secretions. Specifically, anterior nasal fluid and saliva demonstrated a promising combination of high viral loads and minimal patient discomfort. However, only anterior nasal swabs were widely adopted, in part due to the complexity of saliva, its inherent variability between patients, and lack of a standardized method to collect a quality sample. Herein, we aim to standardize saliva sampling by repurposing FishburneTabspaper-based tabs originally designed to diagnose dry mouthas a sample collection tool for viral diagnostics. The workflow for operationalizing dried saliva is aligned with current sample processing methods for dried blood spot cards: (i) a patient collects a saliva sample with a FishburneTab, (ii) the FishburneTab is set on a flat surface to dry, and, after transport to a clinical laboratory, (iii) a standard hole punch is used to acquire punches for analysis. We show that FishburneTabs can reliably collect viral RNA, facilitate long-term dried sample storage, and achieve comparable performance to paired samples of liquid saliva (i.e., 92% accuracy). We validated this approach using a panel of 125 clinical samples, where dried saliva had a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 94% compared to paired liquid samples. These results suggest that FishburneTabs can be used to promote decentralized testing of upper respiratory viral infections through the self-collection of dried saliva.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.