ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2026
Differential responses to the combination of navitoclax and venetoclax with doxorubicin in murine models of triple negative breast cancer.
Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tumor immunosenescence drives breast cancer progression and therapeutic resistance: mechanisms and emerging interventions.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Therapy-induced Senescence (TIS) can potentially influence breast cancer treatment outcomes, in part by contributing to disease recurrence; hence, the utilization of senescence-eliminating agents (i.e., senolytics) is considered as a possible adjuvant to chemoradiation. However, one of the most effective senolytic agents, navitoclax (ABT-263), is limited by its associated toxicities of thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. In contrast, venetoclax (ABT-199), which is currently standard of care in CLL and AML, is of less senolytic potential. Moreover, a comparison between their combinational effect with standard chemotherapy in animal models of breast cancer is not widely explored. This study compared the senolytic potential of the two BH3 mimetics in combination with doxorubicin in two models of triple-negative breast cancer (4T1 and E0771 cells). Methods: Senescence was cytochemically confirmed via Senescence-associated β-galactosidase upregulation (and quantified by flow cytometry), Results: Both navitoclax and venetoclax were effective as apparent senolytics in the E0771 cells. In contrast, only navitoclax was effective against the 4T1 cells. The Conclusions: These findings suggest that administration of venetoclax has the potential to enhance suppression of doxorubicin-exposed cancer cells, and that it may have potential as that of Bcl-xL-targeting agents. However, given the variable outcomes in the two triple-negative breast tumor cell lines, it becomes incumbent to identify the factors that confer susceptibility to Bcl- 2 targeting agents in anticipation of their potential utilization in the clinic for combination therapy in solid tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.