Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41727313›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2026

Differential responses to the combination of navitoclax and venetoclax with doxorubicin in murine models of triple negative breast cancer.

Homood M As Sobeai, Abdulrahman M Alanazi, Faisal Alotaibi, Ali Alhoshani, Khalid Alhazzani, Mashal M Almutairi, Sultan Almudimeegh, Basel K Al-Ramadi, Eesha Chakraborty, Tareq Saleh and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Homood M As SobeaiDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman M AlanaziDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Faisal AlotaibiDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ali AlhoshaniDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid AlhazzaniDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mashal M AlmutairiDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sultan AlmudimeeghDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Basel K Al-RamadiDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Eesha ChakrabortyDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Tareq SalehDepartment of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.
David A GewirtzDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Hisashi HaradaMassey Comprehensive Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Moureq R AlotaibiDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Therapy-induced Senescence (TIS) can potentially influence breast cancer treatment outcomes, in part by contributing to disease recurrence; hence, the utilization of senescence-eliminating agents (i.e., senolytics) is considered as a possible adjuvant to chemoradiation. However, one of the most effective senolytic agents, navitoclax (ABT-263), is limited by its associated toxicities of thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. In contrast, venetoclax (ABT-199), which is currently standard of care in CLL and AML, is of less senolytic potential. Moreover, a comparison between their combinational effect with standard chemotherapy in animal models of breast cancer is not widely explored. This study compared the senolytic potential of the two BH3 mimetics in combination with doxorubicin in two models of triple-negative breast cancer (4T1 and E0771 cells). Methods: Senescence was cytochemically confirmed via Senescence-associated β-galactosidase upregulation (and quantified by flow cytometry), Results: Both navitoclax and venetoclax were effective as apparent senolytics in the E0771 cells. In contrast, only navitoclax was effective against the 4T1 cells. The Conclusions: These findings suggest that administration of venetoclax has the potential to enhance suppression of doxorubicin-exposed cancer cells, and that it may have potential as that of Bcl-xL-targeting agents. However, given the variable outcomes in the two triple-negative breast tumor cell lines, it becomes incumbent to identify the factors that confer susceptibility to Bcl- 2 targeting agents in anticipation of their potential utilization in the clinic for combination therapy in solid tumors.

Indexed as

apoptosisbreast cancerdoxorubicinnavitoclaxsenescencevenetoclax

Identifiers

PMID41727313
PMCPMC12916633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.