Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41727310›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025

Combined point-of-care biomarkers for risk stratification in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department.

Bo Yan, Zheng Wang, Zhi Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bo YanEmergency Department, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zheng WangEmergency Department, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhi LiuEmergency Department, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Risk stratification is crucial for patients aged ≥60 years with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Although the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score is commonly used, it may be less practical in the emergency setting. This study aimed to evaluate whether a combined point-of-care testing (CM-POCT) model using three biomarkers could effectively predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Methods: This retrospective study included 117 patients aged ≥60 years with NSTE-ACS presenting to the emergency department. Point-of-care testing for NT-proBNP, D-dimer, and hs-CRP was performed within 6 h of symptom onset. Independent risk factors were identified, and the predictive value of the three-marker CM-POCT model was compared with the GRACE risk score using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results: Among the 117 participants (mean age 72.2 ± 8.0 years), 27 experienced MACE. Elevated levels of NT-proBNP (≥2,410 pg/mL), D-dimer (≥0.54 µg/mL), and hs-CRP (≥5.58 µg/mL) were each independent predictors of MACE (all Conclusions: The three-marker CM-POCT model could be a more efficient tool for early risk stratification in patients aged ≥60 years with NSTE-ACS in emergency settings. The risk of MACE increases significantly with the number of positive markers.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromeagedbiomarkerspoint-of-care testingrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID41727310
PMCPMC12916683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.