Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41727263›Full record

ArticleEurope's journal of psychology2025

An Investigation of the 10:20 Protection Rule for Detecting Aquatic Hazards.

Jenny Smith, Emmanuel A C Obine, Jo Talbot, Nick Grazier, Charlotte Stevens, Sarah Needham-Beck, Iker Bautista, Benjamin T Sharpe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europe's journal of psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jenny SmithInstitute of Applied Science, University of Chichester, Chichester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0405-0251
Emmanuel A C ObineInstitute of Psychology, Business and Human Sciences, University of Chichester, Chichester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3697-9025
Jo TalbotRoyal Life Saving Society (RLSS), Worcester, United Kingdom.
Nick GrazierRoyal Life Saving Society (RLSS), Worcester, United Kingdom.
Charlotte StevensInstitute of Applied Science, University of Chichester, Chichester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7612-6228
Sarah Needham-BeckInstitute of Applied Science, University of Chichester, Chichester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0576-4790
Iker BautistaInstitute of Applied Science, University of Chichester, Chichester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7409-6290
Benjamin T SharpeInstitute of Psychology, Business and Human Sciences, University of Chichester, Chichester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8539-9935

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seven percent of all injury-related global deaths in 2019 were attributed to drowning, relating to 236,000 lives claimed and the stark reality persists that incidents of drowning continue to occur within zones overseen by trained lifeguards. Some lifeguard training agencies advocate the use of specific scan techniques and patterns and the 10:20 protection rule is recommended by a variety of lifeguarding agencies. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of the 10-second element of the 10:20 protection rule (referred to as the 10-second scan strategy) compared to a more natural scan strategy. Two 30-minute videos were developed capturing scripted and unscripted swimming pool hazards. Water safety experts were then employed to collectively review, identify, and achieve consensus on hazards. In a within-subject design, lifeguards (

Indexed as

drowninghazard detectionmental demandsafetyscanning

Identifiers

PMID41727263
PMCPMC12923190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.