Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41727232›Full record

SynthesisPeerJ2026

Clinical effects and safety of proximal femur bionic nail versus proximal femoral nail anti-rotation or InterTAN for the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wenbin Zhang, Yulin Ma, Feilong Lu, Hao Song, Xiaoming Du, Zhaoxi Yang, Yimei Hu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic ReviewComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wenbin Zhang *Qionglai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Yulin Ma *Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Feilong LuAffiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Hao SongAffiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Xiaoming DuAffiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Zhaoxi YangAffiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Yimei HuAffiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical effects and safety of the proximal femur bionic nail (PFBN) with those of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and InterTAN for the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fracture (IFF). Methods: Studies comparing the clinical efficacy of PFBN with that of PFNA and InterTAN in the treatment of IFF published before 16 December 2025 in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases were retrieved. After the research data were extracted, Review Manager 5.4 (RevMan 5.4 ) was used for data analysis. Results: A total of 15 studies involving 990 patients were included. The meta-analysis results indicated that the PFBN group had advantages over the control group in terms of the postoperative partial and full weight-bearing time, fracture healing time, fracture reduction quality, hospital stay, postoperative Harris score, intraoperative fluoroscopy time and postoperative complication rate (partial weight-bearing time: standardized mean difference ( Conclusion: For the treatment of IFF , the PFBN is more effective and has a lower risk than the PFNA and InterTAN.

Indexed as

Bone NailsFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryHip FracturesFracture HealingHumansPostoperative ComplicationsProximal Femoral FracturesTreatment OutcomeInterTANIntertrochanteric femoral fractureMeta-analysisPFBNPFNAProximal femoral nail anti-rotationProximal femur bionic nail

Identifiers

PMID41727232
PMCPMC12919315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.