ArticlePeerJ2026
Effect of Triton all-in-one irrigant on electronic working length determination using two apex locators: an
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study evaluated whether Triton, a newly introduced all-in-one irrigant, affects the accuracy of electronic working length determination, and compared two electronic apex locators (Ai-Pex, Propex Pixi) under different irrigant conditions. Materials and Methods: Forty-four extracted single-rooted human teeth were embedded in alginate. Actual working length was determined under a dental operating microscope. Specimens were assigned to four groups (Triton, 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 10% citric acid, dry canal). Electronic working lengths were measured with Ai-Pex and Propex Pixi using #15 K-files. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) following normality assessment, with statistical significance set at Results: No significant differences occurred among Triton, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and citric acid groups ( Conclusions: Triton did not reduce apex locator precision, supporting its potential as a time-saving irrigant that permits simultaneous irrigation and measurement. Further clinical validation is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.