ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Virtual reality as a training tool for athletes with intellectual disabilities: a study protocol.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Immersive virtual reality (VR) is increasingly used in education and rehabilitation, yet little is known about its feasibility and tolerability among athletes with intellectual disabilities (ID). Understanding emotional, behavioral, and physical responses is essential before integrating VR into adapted sport training. Methods: This prospective, observational case-series included six male athletes with mild to moderate ID participating in adapted basketball training. Each athlete completed three sessions of low-motion, non-interactive 360° basketball-themed VR using the Meta Quest 3 headset. Emotional responses, behavioral indicators, static and dynamic balance, SSQ-aligned observational symptoms, and detailed usability logs were collected before, during, and after VR exposure. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patterns across sessions. Results: Emotional grading remained predominantly positive across all sessions, with no VR-related negative affect. Engagement increased while distraction and hesitation decreased over time, indicating improved familiarity with immersive environments. Balance performance remained stable post-VR, with no signs of postural deterioration. SSQ-aligned monitoring showed negligible symptoms (98.1% scored zero), and no nausea occurred. Usability challenges were minor and primarily related to controller use, video initiation, and battery life. Discussion: Short, structured VR exposure was well tolerated and operationally feasible for athletes with ID. Findings support VR's potential as a safe and engaging supplementary tool in adapted basketball training, warranting further research with larger and more diverse samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.