ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Voluntary temporal attention improves perception even in the absence of temporal competition.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When successive stimuli occur close enough together in time, their perception can be impaired. Such impairments indicate temporal competition between successive stimuli for representational resources. Voluntary temporal attention can bias processing resources in favor of a behaviorally relevant moment, improving perception at the attended time at the expense of impairments at unattended times. However it is unclear whether these perceptual tradeoffs across time arise because voluntary temporal attention selects among actively competing stimulus representations, such as within visual working memory, or if instead, temporal attention facilitates stimulus processing prior to a competitive stage. Here we used a temporal cueing task with up to two targets in succession to test whether and how the effects of temporal attention depend on temporal competition. We found that voluntary temporal attention improved performance even in the absence of temporal competition, when only one stimulus appeared during the trial. Moreover, the magnitude of attentional enhancement was comparable with and without competition. These results suggest that voluntary temporal attention enhances perception by facilitating processing prior to a competitive stage, rather than by resolving conflicts between actively competing stimulus representations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.