ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Vascular waveform analysis using Bayesian pulse deconvolution.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vascular waveforms, which measure bulk flow in blood vessels, are widely used to measure vital signs, diagnose conditions, and predict long-term health outcomes. Analyzing vascular waveforms depends on three fundamentally interdependent tasks: signal filtering, pulse timing detection, and pulse shape extraction. We hypothesized that Bayesian pulse deconvolution can achieve improved performance on all three tasks by solving them jointly. This method uses an analytical, generative model of vascular waveforms with priors informed by physical and biological domain knowledge. In simulations, Bayesian pulse deconvolution achieves better performance on all tasks compared with existing algorithms: 90% reduction of median filtering error, 60% reduction in pulse timing error, and 85% reduction in shape extraction error. The advantages in simulations extend to human recordings of photoplethysmography waveforms. Taking real time-synchronized electrocardiogram R-R intervals as a proxy ground truth, Bayesian pulse deconvolution achieves 40% lower pulse interval estimation error (RMSE =5.1 ms) compared with typical algorithms (RMSE = 8.3 ms, p=1e-10). By extracting more accurate and informative insights from vascular waveforms, Bayesian pulse deconvolution could advance a wide array of health technologies that rely on interpreting signals from blood vessels.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.