Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41727104›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

From adolescence to adulthood: functional fingerprints of high-level visual cortex reveal differential development of visuospatial processing.

Jewelia K Yao, Justin Choo, Dawn Finzi, Kalanit Grill-Spector

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jewelia K YaoDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0002-0091-6153
Justin ChooDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305.
Dawn FinziDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0003-0636-7375
Kalanit Grill-SpectorDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0002-5404-9606

Funding

Development of Face Perception: Cross-sectional and Longitudinal InvestigationsR01EY022318 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GRILL-SPECTOR, KALANIT · 2012 to 2022
$5.2M
Functional-neuroanatomy of high-level visual cortex: a quantitative multimodal approachR01EY023915 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Kalanit Grill-Spector · 2014 to 2026
$4.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022318NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023915
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reading, social interaction, and navigation rely on visuospatial computations by population receptive fields (pRFs) in category-selective regions of the ventral, lateral, and dorsal streams. However, how visuospatial computations vary across streams and category, or develop during adolescence is unknown. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and pRF modeling in adolescents and adults, we investigate the development of pRFs and category-selectivity. Adolescents and adults show a consistent functional fingerprint whereby, pRF location, pRF size, and visual field coverage vary by category-selectivity, stream, and hemisphere. While pRF location is largely adult-like by adolescence, pRF size, visual field coverage, and category-selectivity exhibit region-specific increases and decreases from adolescence to adulthood. Together, these findings delineate a timeline of continued functional plasticity during adolescence and provide a multidimensional framework for understanding the organization of high-level visual cortex.

Indexed as

adolescencedevelopmenthigh-level visual cortexpopulation receptive fieldsvisuospatial processing

Identifiers

PMID41727104
PMCPMC12918879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.