ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Individual differences in artificial neural networks capture individual differences in human behavior.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human behavior differs substantially across individuals. While artificial neural networks (ANNs) are regarded as promising models of human perception, they are often assumed to lack such individual differences. Here, we demonstrate that multiple instances of the same ANN architecture exhibit substantial individual differences in behavior that mimic those observed in humans. We trained and tested 60 ANN instances from three architectures on a digit recognition task and found notable individual differences in overall accuracy, confidence, and response time (RT). Critically, these individual differences in ANN instances mapped consistently onto the individual differences produced by 60 humans performing the same task, with the mapping strength often approaching the human-to-human benchmark across all three behavioral metrics (accuracy, confidence, RT). The mapping generalized even across behavioral metrics: an ANN instance that aligned with an individual human on accuracy also aligned with the same individual on confidence and RT. These findings generalized to a more complex, 10-choice blurry object recognition task, though the human-ANN mapping was generally less robust than the human-human benchmark. Overall, these findings open the possibility of using ANN ensembles as computational proxies for probing the mechanisms underlying human variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.