ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Low-dose VSV-EBOV vaccination provides rapid protection from lethal Ebola virus challenge.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the decade since the West African Ebola virus (EBOV) epidemic, several medical countermeasures against this often-fatal hemorrhagic disease have been approved by regulatory authorities for human use. This includes monoclonal antibody-based therapies and vaccines which have been stockpiled in limited quantities. One of the vaccines is based on vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) expressing the EBOV glycoprotein (GP) as the immunogen. The vaccine is stockpiled in limited quantity for emergency use. A single high dose has been shown to rapidly protect humans within 10 days. We developed an updated version of this vaccine expressing the GP from the 2015 EBOV-Makona isolate. Here, we wanted to determine the protective efficacy within 10 days of a single moderate dose (10-fold and 1,000-fold dilution) of the updated vaccine in nonhuman primates (NHPs). As a comparator we included a 1000-fold dilution dose group of the approved vaccine expressing the EBOV-Kikwit GP. While we achieved uniform protection with the approved vaccine at the moderate dose, only 50% of the NHPs receiving the same dose of the updated vaccine expressing the EBOV-Makona GP were protected. This study highlights the importance of evaluating VSV-based vaccine stocks expressing different filovirus GPs in preclinical models prior to progression with clinical development. Our study also highlights that rapid vaccination with reduced doses still leads to protection but at the cost of "sterile" immunity raising concerns regarding EBOV persistence and potential downstream transmission. Therefore, lower vaccine doses should only be considered in cases of severe vaccine shortage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.